Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 1261 - 1280 of 6,576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The court granted the motions in part and denied the motions in part. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Hannah Kris
.: The House Committee on Homeland Security will convene a hearing entitled “Understanding the Importance of DHS Preparedness Grants: Perspectives From the Field. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
In light of this ruling, the judgment in the underlying case was vacated.Interestingly, the Superior Court noted that the previous decision in the case of Trigg v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am by Anthony Zaller
Superior Court of Los Angeles (2018), was signed into law by Governor Newsom on September 18, 2019 and will become effective on January 1, 2020. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am by Anthony Zaller
Superior Court of Los Angeles (2018), was signed into law by Governor Newsom on September 18, 2019 and will become effective on January 1, 2020. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm by Bryn Miller
On September 11, 2019, the Superior Court granted SJCERA’s and the County’s motions of summary judgment since the plaintiffs did not successfully meet their burden of proof to present evidence that trial-worthy facts existed. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm by Bryn Miller
On September 11, 2019, the Superior Court granted SJCERA’s and the County’s motions of summary judgment since the plaintiffs did not successfully meet their burden of proof to present evidence that trial-worthy facts existed. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The hope remains that those cases that do go up the appellate ladder will result in published decisions by the Superior Court and grantings of allocatur by the Supreme Court.Here is a quick LINK to the Post-Koken Scorecard on Tort Talk.8. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a decision in Eisenberg v. [read post]