Search for: "HOWARD v. STATE"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the East Valley Tribune) reports on Monday’s denial of cert. in Ryan v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:36 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm
Relying on the opinion of the Indiana Supreme Court in Howard Reg’l Health Sys. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm
Relying on the opinion of the Indiana Supreme Court in Howard Reg’l Health Sys. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Scripps-Howard Broad. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 5:03 am
The state noted it is willing to have its case, if granted, put on the same briefing schedule as King v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:55 am
In a controversial split decision, the Supreme Court of Canada today reaffirmed the deference afforded juries in reaching verdicts based on inferences — even when those inferences are founded on conflicting, circumstantial evidence.The case, R. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times) previews the oral arguments in Reed v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
In the Christian Science Monitor, Howard LaFranchi writes that the gruesome videos, intended to terrify the local population into submission while preventing further US advances into the conflict, may now be backfiring. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
The Jerusalem passport case Zivotofsky v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 2:23 pm
In Fujiwara v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 6:39 am
United States–the removal case–but that case is not cited anywhere in the government’s brief. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:19 am
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Rules v. standards—some carveouts are one, some the other. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am
"] Other aspects of the dispute that had intersting and recurring social media tweaks: other public employee cases have raised the similar issue of whether the employee was speaking as a citizen or an employee; the law is employer-favorable, but I would not be surprised to see an appeals court give her another chance (this aspect of the dispute vaguely reminds me of Bland v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm
October 2012 (MC)), investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sued for defamation (For example, see Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781; Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1382; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
The opinion we are cheddaring about today, Drake v. [read post]
