Search for: "Hill v. Hill" Results 1261 - 1280 of 7,959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
A South Carolina federal district court on Tuesday denied a preliminary injunction in American Humanist Association v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm by Jason Mazzone
The article uses the twentieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 8:46 pm by Juvan Bonni
Asay: Artificial Stupidity (Source: SSRN) Erik Hovenkamp: FTC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:20 pm by FDABlog HPM
  If the manufacturer of a drug or device or sponsor of an applicable clinical trial is seeking approval for a new use of the drug or device, the same information must be submitted on the earliest of 30 days after approval, 30 days after FDA issues a not approval letter or a not substantially equivalent letter, or 30 days after the application is withdrawn without resubmission for no less than 210 days (PHS Act § 402(j)(3)(E)(v)). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
"  He likens it (if I understand his argument) to Justice Harlan's tradition-based methodology of due process in Poe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 285 (PA Commw., April 21, 2017), a Pennsylvania appellate court reversed the dismissal of an inmate's claim that Nation of Islam group religious services were not available.In Hill v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The case of Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC 53 is not authority for the proposition that the police enjoy a general immunity from suit in respect of anything done by them in the course of investigating or preventing crime. [read post]