Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD" Results 1261 - 1280 of 4,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:13 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
N.C.G.S. 7B-311(c) Currently, the list does not appear to follow the individual out of the state of North Carolina. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:13 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
N.C.G.S. 7B-311(c) Currently, the list does not appear to follow the individual out of the state of North Carolina. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm by Mark Ashton
(vaccinate or not) A second issue of interest is justiciability. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Moreover, the parties' prorated shares of child care expenses and future reasonable unreimbursed health care expenses deviated from the CSSA guidelines, since they were not calculated based upon the parties' "gross (total) income as should have been or should be reported in the most recent federal income tax return" (Domestic Relations Law 240[1-b][b][5][I]; 240 [1-b][c][1]). [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:27 am
  If you or your child are being recruited to join a gang, your best bet is to stay far away. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Stewart Baker
Gus lays out the difficulties that YouTube has had meeting the child protection requirements of the Child Online Privacy Protection Rule and the Federal Trade Commission’s growing interest in changing YouTube’s approach to videos aimed at kids. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:57 am
It is an independent non-profit 501(c)(3) public interest law firm with a board of directors. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm by Michael
* Hood, C., Baldwin, R. and Rothstein, H. 2000. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:32 pm by Stephen Page
  (c) The existence and strength of possible motives to remain in the other nominated country (such as the ownership of real estate, the existence of business interests, or the residence of close family and/or personal friends there);Justice Cronin found that the risk of non-return was low. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:36 pm by Georgialee Lang
Shared Parenting Means Giving Up the Best Interests of the Child Test. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Section 230(c)(2) Under §230(c)(1), websites generally aren’t liable for third-party content. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
California—and democracy—would win, and the Court could avoid entangling itself in another political thicket.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]