Search for: "In Re Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
Procedural HistoryContributor Note: Relevant procedural history has been summarized below. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
” Moreover, the Court’s pre-Fourteenth Amendment Barber v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:29 am
In response, Essex filed a motion to dismiss Zuniga's claims under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a, arguing that the "no direct action" rule, Zuniga's lack of standing, and a lack of ripeness bar Zuniga from suing Essex until SDT's liability to Zuniga is determined. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
However, an interesting new initiative has recently emerged – the attempt to achieve litigation reform through amendments to corporate bylaws. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:37 am
They were not civil disobedients. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Denturist Association of Canada, 2014 FC 989, the Federal Court ruled that copyright does not subsist in the five-digit numerical codes and corresponding description of denturist services contained within the DAC Procedures Codes and DAC Fee Guides. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
Ronald Mann covered the decision for this blog; commentary comes from Scott Dodson in posts at the Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog and PrawfsBlawg; he ties Dart to the Court’s 2007 decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Category: Civil Procedure By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor TitleAnticancer, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
And at Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the “‘you, too! [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
Target’s motion to dismiss, filed under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, argued that the financial institutions “have failed to plead sufficient facts to establish any of their claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
This led to an exchange with Chief Justice John Roberts about the fact that different procedural rules continue to apply if the action is brought against the United States in state court; Schnapper responded that the limitations period is a bar to liability, not a procedural rule like the number of depositions a party gets. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Those amendments survive in r 12.73 and PD12G of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) (and there are mirror provisions in r 14.14/PD14E relating to adoption/placement proceedings), and it has been argued by at least one commentator in the criminal context (‘The Self-incrimination Privilege in Care Proceedings and the Criminal Trial and “shall not be admissible in evidence”? [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm
This process is called a “colloquy” under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
Circuits – that district courts can, consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and Article III of the Constitution, certify classes that include numerous members who have not suffered any injury caused by the defendant. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
On a civil case, I'd be nuts. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
Labor relations -- Fair Labor Standards Act -- Overtime -- Former employees of Florida construction contractor brought suit claiming contractor failed to pay wages, including overtime, that they were entitled to receive under FLSA -- Jurisdiction -- District court had subject matter jurisdiction where face of complaint alleged federal claim for unpaid, overtime hours -- Statement of claim that plaintiffs filed under the local practices did not amend that jurisdictional basis out of the… [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Alabama, holding that life without parole for minors violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
" I thought it would be fun, therefore, to (re?) [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
The Example of Laws affecting Civil Society Karla W. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 13-10400, is the high-profile one, asking whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) gives a district court the discretion to extend the time for service of process absent a showing of good cause. [read post]
