Search for: "In re P. Children" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2011, 12:56 pm by Kim Zetter
This one involves a May 2009 airstrike near Garani village in Afghanistan that the local government says killed nearly 100 civilians, most of them children. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
  However, with the ostensible success of the ICWA in improving the lives of Indian children, comes also problems. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
  However, with the ostensible success of the ICWA in improving the lives of Indian children, comes also problems. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:00 pm by wswendson
College might still be in the distant future, but it’s not too early to start thinking about how you’re going to pay for your child’s education. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  It defined “Indian child” the same way the ICWA defines the term and declares:(a)        The Legislature finds and declares the following:(1)  There is no resource that is more vital to the continued existence and integrity of Indian tribes than their children, and the State of California has an interest in protecting Indian children who are members of, or are eligible for membership in, and Indian tribe.(2)  It is in… [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  If a party wanted the court to adopt the exception, it appears that an argument similar to the one adopted in the California Court of Appeals case, In re Santos Y.[22] could be used. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by msW1Ld
The Seventh Circuit accepted an interlocutory appeal on a certified question arising from the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint in In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litig., No.10-8037, 2010 WL 5367383 (7th Cir. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:37 am by admin
  Children given de-worming treatment in Kenya ended up having better attendance at school and growing taller. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charles Messina
  But you’re divorcing him or her, for the love of Pete! [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 12:21 pm by Rick
Unfortunately for us, we are not children in an allegorical model. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:01 pm by Judith G. McMullen
Dubs from NYC was outraged: “So you’re telling me, as long as I’m happy, who cares what happens to my legally wedded spouse and kids? [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:26 pm by John Culhane
Here’s Althouse’s just plain nutty take: And that’s how NPR sees you voters: You’re children. [read post]