Search for: "In the Interest of SB" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 3:53 am by Mandelman
  I understand why the Mortgage Bankers Association supported SB 94, but I for one don’t need or want that kind of “protection,” thank you anyway. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:12 am by Joe Consumer
They are particularly concerned with SB 1116, which would protect a doctor who says that his or her conduct was an exercise of professional judgment and in the best interest of the patient, which they say that Awaad argued all along. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:12 am by Joe Consumer
They are particularly concerned with SB 1116, which would protect a doctor who says that his or her conduct was an exercise of professional judgment and in the best interest of the patient, which they say that Awaad argued all along. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
 One might expect that they were writing about high interest rates and harsh loan terms. [read post]
5 May 2012, 11:15 am by Mandelman
Let me be very clear in stating how many more times I’m interested in hearing this line of unadulterated crap… none, not one, no more. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:52 pm by Administrator
Line 14 of the 2010 Schedule B (SB) says the Funding target attainment percentage is 98.99%. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:07 pm by Michael
Effective January 1, 2012, SB 337 became California Civil Code Section 1940.4. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:56 am
Unfortunately, some Maryland business groups have underestimated the tremendous win that SB 433 is for the business community. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:21 am by David M. McLain
After this seven day period, the bill would require the payment of interest at the rate of 1.5% monthly (18% annually). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:48 am by Molly Foley-Healy
  A highly effective director is familiar with and complies with the SB 100 policy of his/her HOA relating to board member conflicts of interest. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:19 pm by nflatow
But it also so happens that the legal challenge against SB 1070 is being led by the Department of Justice which, for obvious reasons, is not interested in setting legal precedents that would limit the search and seizure power of the police. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:55 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
United States, observing with particular interest because I am counsel in the separate civil rights coalition challenge to S.B. 1070 (and challenges to the five copycat state laws that were enacted in 2011). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:56 am by Matthew Kolken
Kennedy: "So you're saying the government has a legitimate interest in not enforcing its laws? [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:41 pm by Eva Arevuo
For immigration, the question is whether policy will be governed by national interest, or if every state and locality will be free to do as they please, according to local bias. [read post]