Search for: "In the Matter of Jane A"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2013, 11:44 am
HLN, get rid of Nancy Grace and Jane Velez-Mitchell. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:03 am
HLN, get rid of Nancy Grace and Jane Velez-Mitchell. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Jane complains about age discrimination. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 10:02 am
The subgroups will matter more, and the subgroups are more real. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:54 am
(I recently interviewed Covington & Burling partner Mark Plotkin about CFIUS and other matters for the Lawfare Podcast. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Jane: OK. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
“Religion, Democracy, and Equality” August 21-23, 2013 ICLARS Program Draft Wednesday August 21, 2013 Hilton Garden Inn Richmond, Virginia Young Scholar Sessions 2-2:50 p.m. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:13 am
A judgment is simply a legal determination rendered by a judge or judge and jury that you, the claimant, have a right as a matter of law or equity from the defendant. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
All clients, no matter how elite, have commodity type legal work that needs to be done. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:52 am
Jane B. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Columbia Law’s Philip Bobbitt wrote in with thoughts about—yes, you guessed it—Edward Snowden matters. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
Jane: No but. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
It’s all Huey Lewis and the News’ fault. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
Table of Contents Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Companies, he notes, are increasingly looking for advice on what they can and can’t do around the world in terms of things like antitrust, tax, anticorruption, and labour matters, and the focus on global regulation and investigations will bring together existing practice teams involved in that area. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 1:22 pm
The better proposition is for referral source to tell a potential client, ‘I don’t handle that; but, you need to see my friend, Jane Doe. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:06 pm
If Voltage thinks is can sue thousands of John and Jane does in one singles lawsuit, it is likely going to be disappointed, given that each case could present different facts and different defences. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:03 am
Also, staffing of matters is MUCH tighter. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am
Free speech rights aside, professional women . . . do not need the [Jane Does] of the planet eroding their hard earned respect in the marketplace. [read post]
