Search for: "John Doe, Inc."
Results 1261 - 1280
of 5,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2019, 7:46 am
But I will note that ASBCA’s decision here does not apply to typewritten signatures (i.e., /s/ John Doe). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:22 pm
Multieducator Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Licensing, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:43 pm
Facts: This case (Marketquest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:50 am
Johnson believes the bill does not give agriculture a big enough role to play in curbing climate change. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
"In conclusion, the Board found the mark to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive, and it affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:43 am
Hov IP II, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
But the PTO did not raise that objection.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:32 am
" 49 USPQ2d at 1199Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:32 pm
For instance, if John Doe owns a restaurant and hires Jane Doe to be his hostess, if Jane Doe uses force or causes injury to a customer who decides to sue, John Doe will argue that force was not part of Jane Doe’s employment. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
Snow 95,000 130,000 0 0 225,000 John R. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:23 am
In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); In re Aerospace Optics, Inc., 78 USPQ2d 1861, 1862 (TTAB 2006). [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:05 am
May 11, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed three lower court decisions holding that various defendant rating agencies, including The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., Moody’s Investors Service Inc. and Fitch, Inc. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:36 am
John Fothergill, D2010-1284 (WIPO September 20, 2010) is on one end of the spectrum (where it cannot plausibly deny knowledge of the complainant) and Halo Innovations, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 3:49 pm
" After Ed McMahon repeats the question and Johnny does a double-take, he tears open the envelope to read: DORSAL NIGHT SPLINT.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:47 am
Black Expo, Inc., 932 F. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:02 pm
., John W. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
" Despite the fact that Opposer, a Cuban entity, "does not and cannot engage in any business in the United States due to the embargo on Cuban goods," the Board concluded that Opposer has a "real interest" in the outcome of this proceeding, and thus has standing.Turning to the merits of the 2(e)(3) claim, the pertinent elements were set out in In re California Innovations Inc., 66 USPQ2d 1853, 1856-57 (Fed. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2005, 5:00 am
"The Board therefore dismissed the opposition and denied the petition for cancellation.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
