Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 10,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 6:25 am
• Requires the use of existing resources to develop a federal post-conviction risk assessment tool that uses empirical data to classify all federal prisoners as (1) low-risk of recidivism; (2) medium risk of recidivism; or (3) high risk of recidivism, and allow for regular reassessments of each eligible prisoner over time. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 10:35 am
"At The Lectern's weekly report on petitions for review notes the granting of (1) a petition filed ten days late and (2) a petition filed by a pro per. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:21 am
Privacy of medical data in the workers' compensation system does not exist. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:50 am
Discuss among yourselves.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:01 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:30 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:02 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
1. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:29 am
Masiello).The Board first considered the issue of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:04 am
2. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 3:04 am
The PTO issued a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark IPEN, deeming it to be merely descriptive of digital pens and online retail store services featuring digital pens. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:23 am
Because the Board found that the standard peace symbol does not function as a mark and is unregistrable, it was unnecessary to address Craigslist's claim of acquired distinctiveness.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 5:31 am
What does that mean? [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
1. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 5:31 am
What does that mean? [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:14 am
Cranfill, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: John P. [read post]
