Search for: "Lake v State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:37 am
., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:01 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 9:40 pm
County of Lake v Pahl, 28 NE3d 1092 (IN App 2015)Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:03 am
" Lake County Board of Zoning Appeals, et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:58 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:09 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:29 am
The court then stated: "... [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
He executed the warrant with Dean Kharasch, cybercrimes investigator for the Lake County State's Attorney's office. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
See "The New Politics of Judicial Elections in the Great Lakes States, 2000–2008" by Justice at Stake. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm
Ct. 360 (2018) (mem.); First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
"However, this broad discretion is not 'unlimited'" (Matter of Lake v Town of Southold, 189 AD3d 1588, 1591, quoting Matter of Maynard v Monaghan, 284 App Div 280, 283). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
"However, this broad discretion is not 'unlimited'" (Matter of Lake v Town of Southold, 189 AD3d 1588, 1591, quoting Matter of Maynard v Monaghan, 284 App Div 280, 283). [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:00 am
Lake Central School Corp., 2014 WL 174675 (N.D. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
The resulting case was filed as Bartholomew Sojka v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
That trend began with the Supreme Court’s decision last Term (United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:20 am
The US Supreme Court case Carpenter v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]