Search for: "Land v. State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 13,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm
Florida land use and environmental law attorney Jake Cremer has posted the Brief in Opposition in Koontz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:18 am
United States (Monetary Damages; Subject Matter Jurisdiction) United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:04 am
<> Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The other shoe has dropped in the Cambridge v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 8:59 am
In the case of Brown v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:14 pm
The case is USA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
This morning, the United States Supreme Court declined to review court decisions out of Iowa in KFC Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
This case, Koontz v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:52 pm
Frey (Maine Indian Settlement Acts; Water and Land Rights; Penobscot River) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:09 pm
Jewell (Land into Trust)Poarch Band of Creek Indians, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v.James Hildreth, Jr., in his official capacity as Tax Assessor of Escambia County, Alabama, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant (Indian Lands - Taxation) United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:35 am
In DeCook v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
Washington (Indian Gaming Compact - "Most-favored Tribe")* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlEagleman v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:39 pm
Alexis v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
Last month, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm
State of Indiana [Marion Superior Court, Criminal Division 13,... [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:03 pm
Entry 50 of List II does not constitute an exception to the position of law laid down in M P V Sundararamier (supra). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:59 am
We have to land.' When there was no sign that the plane was in fact returning to Las Vegas to land, Mr. [read post]