Search for: "Law v. State" Results 1261 - 1280 of 157,365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
If the law is unconstitutional for one, then it is unconstitutional for all registered sex offenders living in the state. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 11:54 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Adam Lamparello (Indiana Tech - Law School) has posted Riley v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm by Zachary Spilman
CAAF heard oral argument last week in the Article 62 appeal case of United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:41 am by Family Law
Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog: At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:21 am by becassidy
Check out our newest collection at C|M|Law library: Terry v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:43 am by Luke Rioux
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and Others v Information Commissioner, Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening Court of Appeal “There could be no question of the retention of records of old minor convictions being held in the national police computer to be either excessive or being held for longer than necessary. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:26 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Criminal Procedure Reopen and amend provisions This appeal is about a "reopen-and-amend" provision of a plea agreement, a phrase coined by prior Wisconsin case law referring to those plea bargains where the State and defendant agree that a judgment of conviction, once announced, will be amended by the State upon the happening of some future event. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:24 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Keitner (Univ. of California - Hastings College of the Law) has posted an ASIL Insight on Germany v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:57 am
Housing authority need not state the obvious that the offer is  final Omar v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), a state law claim is impliedly preempted if it does not implicate a traditional state law tort principle and exists solely by virtue of a federal statute. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 am by sally
R (Mirza and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 159; [2011] WLR (D) 55 “The Home Secretary, when refusing to extend a foreign national’s leave to remain in the United Kingdom, ought at the same time or promptly thereafter make a removal decision which, if adverse, would enable the foreign national to appeal without breaking the law by overstaying. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:17 pm by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Oil States v. [read post]