Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 1261 - 1280 of 8,597
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The fact that the deadline in the court’s scheduling order for disclosure of expert witnesses had not yet passed did not relieve plaintiff of his burden to “lay bare his proof and show that a genuine question of fact exists” in opposition to the cross motion for summary judgment (Oot v Home Ins. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:33 am by Pamela C. Maloney
Circuit Judge Newman filed a dissention opinion to express her view that the patent described a patent-eligible mechanical and electronic device of defined structure and mechanism (Yu v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:31 am by Bob Kelley
Juror stated he “would tend to see a police officer as more credible” than a lay witness. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:35 am by Matthew Raynor (Bristows)
On Wednesday 16 June 2021, Mr Justice Mellor handed down his judgment in the second technical trial in the Mitsubishi & Sisvel v OnePlus & Xiaomi proceedings ([2021] EWHC 1639 (Pat)), holding that the patents in suit were valid and essential to the LTE standard. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:34 pm by Rik Lambers (Brinkhof)
The interplay between EPO and national proceedings may take various forms. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
Of course, the plaintiffs’ lawyers knew that Judge Pointer, unlike Judges Jones and Weinstein, believed that both sides’ expert witnesses were extreme, and mistakenly believed that the truth lay between. [read post]