Search for: "Levi v Levi" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 2:49 am by CMS
The Council therefore levied charges for Andrew’s community care services by assessing his means and ability to pay. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:19 am by CMS
As would be the case for normal dividend withholding tax payments, the MOD rules allowed the investor to claim a tax credit against the notional overseas withholding tax levied on the borrower. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
I needed to read Texas v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:52 am by David Kopel
” “If allowed to stand as a tax, the Minimum Essential Coverage provision would be the only tax in U.S. history to be levied directly on individuals for their failure to affirmitively engage in activity mandated by the government not specifically delineated in the Constitution. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Brian Clarke
Levy was a top Supreme Court advocate, having argued 16 times before the Court and, in January 2009, won a 9-0 victory for DuPont in an important ERISA case (Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:16 am by J
I bring you two important cases from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) about sub-let fees and administration charges:Holding & Management (Solitaire Ltd) v Norton and other appeals [2012] UKUT 1 and Re: Bradmoss Ltd [2012] UKUT 3 (LC). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:16 am by J
I bring you two important cases from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) about sub-let fees and administration charges:Holding & Management (Solitaire Ltd) v Norton and other appeals [2012] UKUT 1 and Re: Bradmoss Ltd [2012] UKUT 3 (LC). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm by NL
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm by NL
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Levi Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General. [read post]