Search for: "London v. State" Results 1261 - 1280 of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 9:23 am by Joe Trytten
Morales-Vázquez, No. 19-1503, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (January 19, 2021), Judge Bruce M. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
A finding of infringement is a finding that a monopoly granted by the state is to be enforced. [read post]
The judgment is clear that what is to be judged objectively is not the defendant’s actions but his subjective state of mind. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  In respect of the former, his Lordship referred inter alia to the decisions in Sentges v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Annual meeting and diversity conference Time: 21st January 2020, 9.00 to 17.00 Place: Kilburn & Strode at Lacon London, 84 Theobalds Road, London WC1X 8NL. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:20 pm
The judgment was shortly before Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, which put paid to any such suggestion on appeal. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Osman, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow (2017) EWHC 274 (Admin) A challenge to Harrow’s allocation policy, specifically on the ‘downgrading’ of allocation priority for overcrowded households in PRS accommodation, while existing Harrow tenants kept the higher priority for overcrowding on a transfer application. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
In Okon v London Borough Of Lewisham [2016] EWHC 864 (Ch) – quite astonishingly, an appeal against a making of a bankruptcy order – Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am by Dave
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:37 am by David Canton
In the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, Tucows.Com Co v. [read post]