Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2007, 12:54 am
Her exit comes at the same time that Jerry Marks, Heller's Los Angeles managing partner and a well-known securities litigator, is jetting for Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
The FJC's analysis was limited to seven California superior courts and four California federal courts, but encompassed Los Angeles County, which has long had a hyperactive class action docket, and the FJC issued the usual caveats. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm by Audrey A Millemann
The plaintiff, Alexander Forouzesh, filed his complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court on June 1, 2016. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:27 am by Lara
”  Not much of a reprieve for CytoSport, which must be exhausted from fighting a California Proposition 65 class action lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court wherein the court recently approved a settlement enabling consumers who purchased any Muscle Milk®, Monster Milk®, CytoMax®, or Mighty Milk® product between June 4, 2006 and January 5, 2012 to file a claim to receive “up to $20. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 9:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff alleges that the Los Angeles Lakers were filming an instructional basketball video in Private School Doe's gym and that students and faculty were allowed to meet and interact with the players during breaks in the filming. [read post]
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
(See the cases cited in Joe's comment below.)So the couples might go to the local Superior Court for that County. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]