Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2008, 6:57 pm
In affirming remand of the case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, the Ninth Circuit held that the specificity of the Securities Act ban on removal overrode the more general allowance of removal in CAFA. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:30 pm
Southern California Gas Co., Los Angeles Superior Court No. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
The Court remanded for consideration in light of Arizona v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:00 pm
(B197692; 161 Cal.App.4th 488, mod. 161 Cal.App.4th 1513c; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC296369.) [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands… [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:29 pm
Macrida Patterson, 52, alleges that she was hurt last May by a defective "low-rise v-string" from the Victoria's Secret "Sexy Little Thing" line, according to a lawsuit filed last week in Los Angeles Superior Court....Jason Buccat, told TSG that a "design problem" caused the decorative piece to come loose and strike Patterson in the eye, causing damage to her cornea. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:04 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles, the case examining the circumstances under which parents can homeschool their children, will be re-argued in the... [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Macrida Patterson, 52, alleges that she was hurt last May by a defective "low-rise v-string" from the Victoria's Secret "Sexy Little Thing" line, according to a lawsuit filed last week in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:27 am
6-12-2008 California:This district's Court of Appeal yesterday rejected a man's claim that the state's sex offender registration law violates equal protection by requiring mandatory registration for individuals who engage in oral copulation with a minor, but not for those who engage in sexual intercourse.Affirming Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Steven D. [read post]
25 May 2008, 11:40 pm
While an undergraduate at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, she married Grant B. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Further on the characterization of this as an "activist" court, the Los Angeles Times reported today the views of Professor Gerald Uelmen of the University of Santa Clara Law School, who said he was "blown away" and "very surprised" by the decision. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:59 am
Housing Authority of City of Los Angeles (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th. 267. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
by Christine Hanley, Stuart Pfeifer and Christian Berthelsen, Los Angeles Times Staff WritersSex Offender Research, Recidivism and the Truth [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 9:03 am
The Superior Court Of Los Angeles County (2008) __Cal.App.4th__ [08 C.D.O.S. 3935] (2nd District). [read post]