Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 1261 - 1280 of 36,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 6:42 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 806(A) provides that When a hearsay statement, or a statement defined in Evid.R. 801(D)(2), (c), (d), or (e), has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked, and... [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:41 pm
> Never discuss client matters with anyone outside the office. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:36 am by Sean Hanover
More information on the application of 209(c) can be found in the case Matter of Jean, 23 I&N Dec 373 (AG 2002). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:43 pm
" The jury returned a unanimous verdict, answering this question in the negative, and the court stated on the record that the cross claimants were not, as a matter of law, entitled to indemnification from York. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 10:53 am
Contents include:ArticlesDaniel Druckman & Lynn Wagner, Justice Matters: Peace Negotiations, Stable Agreements, and Durable Peace Nadiya Kostyuk & Yuri M. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:46 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Judge Kantor, noting that the review involved a matter of public interest, ruled that Yelp! [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
 The Third Circuit noted that §1447(c) instead only allows for an award of attorney fees in cases involving a remand where the removal to federal court failed to meet the statutory requirements, or where the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the removed case. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
§ 1447(c), which provides that “If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded. [read post]
31 May 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:This article is offered in response to historian Allen C. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:41 pm by Allan Blutstein
§ 1367(a)(2), applied to detainees' travel documents and immigration proceedings, but such information was properly withheld pursuant to Exemptions 6 and 7(C); and (c) ICE properly relied on the deliberative process privilege to withhold internal discussions about logistics for removal flights; (d) ICE properly withheld an intelligence report, information on removal operations, and negotiations with a foreign government under Exemption 7(E); and (3) DHS failed to prove as… [read post]