Search for: "MATTER OF T H" Results 1261 - 1280 of 6,318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2020, 11:36 am by Kathleen Doody
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:28 pm by Patricia Hughes
In other words, the oath requirement does not completely deny the appellants’ right to express their views on the matter. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 12:14 am by Florian Mueller
For example, if Oracle's Android-Java copyright case against Google had not been assigned to Judge William H. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
”But in the case of the military policy that preceded “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” it appeared that status was as important as conduct. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:36 pm by Trent Dykes
The amendment also expands the qualified institutional buyer exemption under Rule 144A by adding RBICs to Rule 144A(a)(1)(i)(C) and limited liability companies to Rule 144(a)(1)(i)(H). [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:36 pm by Trent Dykes
The amendment also expands the qualified institutional buyer exemption under Rule 144A by adding RBICs to Rule 144A(a)(1)(i)(C) and limited liability companies to Rule 144(a)(1)(i)(H). [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Noting that "[t]he State Constitution grants both houses of the legislature the authority to settle the rules of proceedings in their own [h]ouse," the trial court found that "[i]t is [not] the constitutional duty of the judiciary to review … the rules of proceedings within the legislative chambers. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
If the use-mention distinction doesn't matter for oral statements, why should it matter for written ones? [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:57 am by SHG
The Hearing Officer held that it didn’t matter what Braasch said or did, but was entirely up to the Yale cops to characterize their response in whatever way they deemed best. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The GAO referred the matter to the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security for further review and potential action. [read post]