Search for: "Matter of Steel" Results 1261 - 1280 of 2,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Steel & Anor v NRAM PLC (Scotland), heard 7 Nov 2017. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Christopher Danzig
A few months ago, I wrote about an attorney named John Steele. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Brennan W. Bolt
If that challenge is successful, then any new vote on the "quickie election" rules would be null and void under New Process Steel. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 4:23 pm
And, for that matter, isn't there at least as much reason to view Bybee as being "improperly motivated" (by the desire to get his judicial apponitment) as John Yoo? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm by Roberto M. Suárez
”  Regardless of the fate of the Bilski claims, Judge Rader bases his dissent on the fact that the court “links patent eligibility to the age of iron and steel at a time of subatomic particles and terabytes. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:48 am by Dave Hoffman
It's not just the handful of big hits that matter. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Cecelia Lawshe
According to Steele, “reopening this case was not a question. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
 The trustees, for their part, simply treated the matter as closed. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:01 am
The effect of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Sahney Steel and Ponni Sugars is that the purpose behind the subsidy must be examined. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
See AK Steel Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 12:04 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  For that matter, hating "the gays" and hating racial minorities do not necessarily flow from the same well of grievance. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:01 am by Jack Goldsmith
Former CIA Director John Brennan has shown the least discipline on these matters. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:33 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Steel Authority of India Ltd had held that the phrase “in relation to arbitral proceedings” covered even arbitration-related court proceedings. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
The Opposition Division came to the conclusion that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent as granted was not novel, and that the auxiliary request lacked clarity within the meaning of Article 84 EPC. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
The Opposition Division came to the conclusion that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent as granted was not novel, and that the auxiliary request lacked clarity within the meaning of Article 84 EPC. [read post]