Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States, the Supreme Court has agreed to take up the question.I find the whole debate very odd. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Vigilance from the bench relative to the collection of fines is one thing; but incarceration of a defendant that lacks any ability to pay constitutes a debtor's prison.Incarceration for the inability to pay fines and costs was proscribed by the United States Supreme Court in the 1983 case of Bearden v Georgia. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
Because I find that SunPower's complaint fails to state a claim under CFAA, its only federal cause of action, I will not address the state law claims. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
United States “will test whether the Court will keep its word that original writs of habeas corpus are a real backstop for AEDPA’s restrictions on postconviction review. [read post]
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:14 am by Kathy Kapusta
While the university argued that the Tenth Circuit, in Etsitty v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The most recent affirmative action case before the Supreme Court of the United States is Fisher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
In this declaration, Patterson explained that the database at issue `consisted of telecommunications metadata obtained from United States  telecommunications providers pursuant to administrative subpoenas served upon the service providers under the provisions of 21 U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Both counsel for the tribe and the United States hit this point very effectively. [read post]