Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 1261 - 1280 of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
No damages were awarded as B had failed to respond to a Court direction with the time limits.Comment: this case provides further evidence of the applicability of Art 8 to the private sector (see for example our notes on Pelipenko and Buckland here and here). [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
No damages were awarded as B had failed to respond to a Court direction with the time limits.Comment: this case provides further evidence of the applicability of Art 8 to the private sector (see for example our notes on Pelipenko and Buckland here and here). [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:01 am by Mark Ashton
Wife responded that the alimony was “reimbursement” alimony as contemplated by Zullo v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The term debt collector under the Act means any person who: (1) uses any instrument of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the collection of any debts; or (2) regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or asserted to be owed or due another. 15 U.S.C.A. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
This is the second of two blogs on the recent Supreme Court case of Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2 . [read post]