Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2014, 10:19 am
Lawyers for IndyMac MBS told the Court that it agreed with the views expressed in the letter by the underwriting firms, and noted that it is not a party to the proposed settlement. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:37 am
City of Reno, 747 F.3d 733 (9th Cir. 2014) (holding that a broad forum selection clause superseded FINRA Rule 12200), with UBS Fin. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:40 am
The Court went on to describe how one could be liable for inducing infringement, holding, “one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:23 am
The court said that “the explicit requirement in [the definition of “Claim”] demonstrates that the parties knew how to include a service requirement when they so desired. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:51 am
Background Asco was hired by the City of Kingston to renovate a theatre. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
County of Colusa (Adams Group Inc., Real Party in Interest) (3d Dist. 2014) ____ Cal.App.4th ____, Case No. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 7:25 am
The parties attempted voluntary mediation but could not reach an agreement. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:19 pm
Raymours Furniture Co., Inc.). [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:17 am
City of Cleveland, 10 Ohio St.3d 77, 461 N.E.2d 1273 (Ohio Supreme Court 1984).Fikri v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:12 pm
Arctic Cat, Inc., 84 A.D.3d 890, 891, 923 N.Y.S.2d 168, 170 (2nd Dept. 2011), holds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to consider plaintiff’s expert’s affidavit in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgement. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:12 pm
Arctic Cat, Inc., 84 A.D.3d 890, 891, 923 N.Y.S.2d 168, 170 (2nd Dept. 2011), holds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to consider plaintiff’s expert’s affidavit in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgement. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
The parties presented conflicting expert testimony as to the economic viability of the property. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
Vodenichar v Halcon Energy Properties Inc., 733 F.3d 497 (3d Cir. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Paragon Data Systems, Inc., Case No. 12-3025; -3058 (6th Cir., June 25, 2014) (Cleland, J., sitting by designation). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 6:10 am
Related blog posts: $79.74 Million Jury Verdict When Driver is Buried Alive Under Sand After Being Hit by a Tractor-Trailer Illinois Appellate Court Finds That OSHA Violations Did Not Raise Duty of Care to Hold Parties Responsible $726,000 Jury Verdict in the Death of a Driver Who Rear-Ended a Stopped Flatbed Truck [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
The Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest (2014) ___ Cal.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:38 am
Harvard Enter's, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
