Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
Option 1 was rejected as too narrow, leaving the possibility that serious errors of law affecting large numbers of people would go uncorrected. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:33 am
In Thornton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
When asked about the clause in the bill regarding “intersexuality”, Mr McBride said the clause was designed to deal “with attacking people’s sexual orientation in a vile way…”. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:17 pm
Lord Justice Henry's held in Bailey v IBC Vehicles [1998] EWCA Civ 566 that: “The signature of the bill of costs under the Rules is effectively the certificate by an officer of the Court that the receiving party’s solicitors are not seeking to recover in relation to any item more than they have agreed to charge their client under a contentious business agreement. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
Or 12 people like [jailed juror] Joanne Fraill? [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:49 pm
In fact the case, of Street v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
Janet Lord and Rosemary Kayess led the afternoon session on day 3. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:28 am
--Righthaven v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:01 am
Consequently, of the 2,201 stops that lasted over one hour: 41 per cent were of Asian people, 10 per cent were of black people and 30 per cent were of ‘other’ ethnic groups. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
If that were true, the prosecution of E could send the wrong message to other young people being similarly exploited. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
This issue was considered at length in Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
This consternation is expressed in the first paragraph of the Supreme Court’s judgment in this case, given by Lady Hale and Lord Wilson, and most of the following paragraphs are given over to diluting the effect of the Grand Chamber’s decision. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Omega here Omega Three here (for people who take themselves seriously) and here (for people who don't) [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
The families argued that Re McKerr had been rendered obsolete by the recent Strasbourg decision of Šilih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) Lord Ashcroft KCMG v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) Cook v Telegraph Media Ltd, heard 9 June 2011 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm
Finally on that day a judgment was given in a similar application which had been made to lift an injunction held by Sir Fred Goodwin, Goodwin v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 1309 (QB) following Sir Fred’s naming in the House of Lords by Lord Stoneham. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
Some argue that it might deter people from using the Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
In YL v Birmingham City Council (2007) private sector care homes were found not to be functional public authorities. [read post]
