Search for: "People v. Poole" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
Consult with people with disabilities for accommodation ideas. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
Consult with people with disabilities for accommodation ideas. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
Consult with people with disabilities for accommodation ideas. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
“Tort deform” laws tied the hands of judge and jury – the only people who see, hear and evaluate the evidence before them in open court. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Insurers are experimenting with the data pools and finding they can be as revelatory as a blood test. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am by Phil Dixon
Second, the court must determine whether the jury pool was infected with actual prejudice from the publicity. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm by Jodie Liu
  National Security Letter Program Reforms Title V of the new House bill reforms the FBI’s national security letter program in similar fashion as the Leahy bill did. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The jury system as understood in America seems to me as direct and extreme a consequence of the dogma of the sovereignty of the people as universal suffrage. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am by Leila Nadya Sadat
Ambassador for War Crimes Beth Van Schaack has argued, grant what can be described as a form of “pooled” jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Tunheim thinks it fair to say that no court system in the world offers as many people as easy access to as many documents as is offered by PACER. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm by Prof. Rick Sander, guest-blogging
A further insult was that the paper had been included in an amicus brief submitted by opponents of affirmative action urging the Supreme Court to hear [Fisher v. [read post]