Search for: "Pilot v. State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:28 am
On the 26 April 2017, the US Supreme Court will hear arguments on this issue in Sandoz v Amgen. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:50 pm
Supreme Court case Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:50 pm
Supreme Court case Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
Balikama v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:31 am
This issue has recently been addressed in the case of Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Relies on member states; referrals go through national authorities. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm
”[1] Which pretty succinctly states the main point of this entire series of blog posts: that human agency matters. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Certification marks have been available at a national level in some member states (e.g. the UK, Germany) for a while, but the lack of EU-wide marks has led to inconsistent certification regimes/standards, and geographical gaps in certification. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:47 am
The 12th case in the collection, Xiang Jiahong v Dreamer Film Ltd. et al., was selected specifically to show the boundary of fair use regarding calligraphy works.The plaintiff, Xiang Jiahong (Mr Xiang), is a well-known calligrapher. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:26 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:55 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:59 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:16 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:43 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 6:27 pm
In Ferguson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
Weight Watchers Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
