Search for: "Prince v State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2019, 6:50 am
Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States, states the Internet Stroke Center. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm
The decision to make Sweden Protestant was made during the state council (riksråd) in Västerås in 1527. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
Justice Kagan with opinion in Gundy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
” Aside from a speeding ticket, Clark had no adult criminal record in the state of Connecticut as of fall 2009, according to the Independent. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
: (SpicyIP), Moving towards the nano age: (SpicyIP), YouTube (Google) and T-Series copyright dispute: (SpicyIP), (TechWhack), JapanIP Value in Japan - the alternative view: (IAM),South KoreaSouth Korea has been urged to strengthen its intellectual property rules in order to sign a free trade agreement with the European Union: (Intellectual Property Watch)The NetherlandsDutch teenager arrested, and another five questioned by police, for allegedly stealing virtual furniture from… [read post]
Hunter’s Heroic Epic: Biden Files Motion Comparing Himself to Dead Romanovs and Ancient Greek Heroes
1 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
Hunter v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
Ilaria Bertini, UK Human Rights Blog: Mortier v Belgium: A landmark decision on euthanasia in the case of mental illness: on the recent decision of the ECtHR on Belgium’s law relating to euthanasia. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
"[A] requirement of evidence of authenticity...applies to all writings whose relevancy depends upon authorship by a particular person" (Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 9-101 [Farrell 11th Ed]). [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm
” Brenman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court stated that a term will only be implied if it satisfies the case of “business necessity” or it is “so obvious that it goes without saying”. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:46 pm
The State invited her to be director in large schools in the central region of Porto Alegre (near where we lived), but she also never accepted. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
HRH The Duchess of Cambridge and HRH Prince George of Cambridge v OK! [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The relevant section states that “The exclusive rights of the owner of copyright in a sound recording … do not extend to the making or duplication of another sound recording that consists entirely of an independent fixation of other sounds, even though such sounds imitate or simulate those in the copyrighted sound recording. [read post]
