Search for: "ROMANS v. ROMANS" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 am
copy model- via voor het publiek toegankelijke instellingenvan een kopie in digitale vorm van auteursrechtelijk beschermde romans, verhalenbundels, biografieën, reisverslagen, kinderboeken en jeugdliteratuur? [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
 It is generally easy to "do as the Romans do" when you are in fact in Rome or in London or in Delhi. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:03 am by Lyle Denniston
This marked the first time that a federal appeals court had rejected a claim that the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in the case of Burwell v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:40 pm by Seeger Weiss LLP
Vito Caruso will oversee cases outside New York City, which will be assigned to four regionally designated judges: Justice Michael Mackey, Justice Michael V. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:52 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas's dissent in Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Hence, as Justice O'Connor put it in her concurrence in McCreary County, Ky. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 12:59 am by Frank Cranmer
Merger of Roman Catholic dioceses in Wales On 12 September 2024, Pope Francis announced the merger of two of the three Roman Catholic dioceses in Wales. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:26 am by Lyle Denniston
”  That would be a perfect description of the argument Wednesday in Yates v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 4:38 am by SHG
Remember the qualms about electing JFK because of the fear that he would be a pawn of the Roman Catholic Pope? [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
The first major decision of the Supreme Court on this point - Central Bank of India v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am by New Books Script
25 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 23 from 2012: HV 8599 G8 K45 2012 This side of silence : human rights, torture, and the recognition of cruelty Tobias Kelly. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:31 am by Steve Lubet
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Ableman v. [read post]