Search for: "Robert D. Thomas"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 4:07 pm
It is a 9-0 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, although Justice Thomas (joined by Justices Alito and Scalia) concurred only in the judgment. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
Justice Thomas, joined by Justices Scalia and Alito, wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in which he contended that the Court should have overturned Basic. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Thomas K. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:59 am
Justice Clarence Thomas has probably the most unique take...Wouldn't you know?!... [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Bill Mears of CNN, Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:48 pm
If there’s a better lawyer in the country, I’d like to meet him. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
§ 27.001(7)(A), (B), (D). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
Four Justices – Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts – joined all of Justice Kennedy’s opinion with the exception of Part II-D, a brief section which indicated that the Court’s holding was also consistent with the “presumption against preemption” – the principle that courts should construe express preemption statutes narrowly. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
In his column at Verdict, he looks at the broader questions raised by the Court’s opinion, while at Dorf on Law he “address[es] a question of statutory construction that divides CJ Roberts and the majority, on one hand, from Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, on the other. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:44 am
Breyer wrote for the Court to uphold the law, but Scalia and Thomas again dissented, and Chief Justice John Roberts (joined by Alito) wrote separately to prevent “incautious readers [from thinking] they have found in the majority opinion something they would not find in either the Constitution or any prior decision of ours: a federal police power. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
§ 27.001(7)(A), (B), (D). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
Thereafter, without expressly renouncing strict judicial review, Hughes joined President Franklin D. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Today, as part of my stint guest-blogging about Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution, I’m going to talk about free speech. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:37 am
Justice Kagan wrote the opinion for a non-ideological majority that included Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, and Sotomayor. [read post]
26 May 2014, 1:08 pm
Below is the letter from Annette Demers on behalf of the Canadian Association of Law Libraries (CALL/ACBD) and John Papadopoulos and Jeanne Maddix on behalf of the Canadian Council of Academic Law Library Directors which was also endorsed by Robert Thomas on behalf of the Saskatchewan Library Association. [read post]
24 May 2014, 8:22 am
Ellis Thomas D. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:00 am
Articles by Paul Benjamin Linton, Robert F. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:00 am
The attorneys for Schulz was Ty D. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Thomas; The D. [read post]
