Search for: "Rock v. United States"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
[v] “According to a 2007 interview Klein gave on Colombian TV, his infant firm made $2 million from that deal alone. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Charter, which enshrines the “sovereign equality” of the United Nations’ members. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
One must accept that human rights are not like edicts inscribed on a rock. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Joan presaged her position in two pandemic-era cases involving the Harvest Rock Church and South Bay United Pentecostal Church. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Trademark law rears its ugly head in the world of rock! [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Doug Berman (Sentencing Law and Policy) quotes some of my own favorite parts of the Constitution and opines that the criminal-law related provision given the least respect or attention in modern times is the Reprieves-and-Pardons Clause of Article II (“The President … shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment”). [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am
Nor is it the first time Americans have struggled with how to steer our collective ship away from the rocks of “an oligarchic form of society. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
State of play When all this began in March 2010 – the same day President Obama signed the legislation, both Virginia and the Florida-led multi-state coalition filed complaints in federal court – mainstream pundits dismissed the challenges as legally frivolous, politically motivated sour grapes. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
Hilen v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:19 pm
As we all know by now, after the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
