Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 6,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 9:04 am
Absent proof of the kind of systematic, sub rosa discrimination that convinced the Court in South Carolina v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
There are a number of steel plate antidumping orders in effect:certain hot-rolled carbon steel plate and high-strength low-alloy plate originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China (Plate III);certain hot-rolled carbon steel plate and high-strength low-alloy steel plate originating in or exported from the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Romania (Plate V); andcertain carbon steel plate and high strength low alloy steel plate originating in… [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:27 am
The California Supreme Court is expected to issue its long-awaited decision in Brinker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:46 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 3:58 pm
The complaint (full text) in Uberti v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:23 am
Such was the case in Hamilton v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:12 am
Louis Post-Dispatch writes about the Bachman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
Coogan and Philips v News Group Newspapers [2012] EWCA Civ 48 -read judgment The Court of Appeal today dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:59 pm
If you are involved in rock and roll. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
But I'm also incredibly disturbed by the willingness of the California judiciary to find "exigent circumstances" in any setting in which you don't roll off your chair laughing at the suggesting that someone might perhaps, just maybe, in a parallel universe be alive and waiting desperately to be found in whatever area the police happen to want to search. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
Landlords should review their portfolios and pay any ‘rolled over’ deposits into a tenancy deposit scheme where they have tenants who occupy under ASTs granted before 6 April 2007 and who have stayed put after the expiry of the initial fixed term, in order to preserve their right to regain possession. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
“Oh boy,” my son said, rolling his eyes. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:37 am
Dismissal of the antitrust claim (2010-1 Trade Cases ¶76,953) was affirmed.The March 14, 2011, decision is Active Disposal, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:55 am
A subscription to this service through CQ Roll Call is required for online access. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:14 pm
Rolls-Royce Corporation, et al., No. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:22 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 10:39 am
Rolling the dice on a jury trial is risky. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:22 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
