Search for: "Roman v. Roman"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
In Public Health Sudbury & Districts v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 4:38 am
Remember the qualms about electing JFK because of the fear that he would be a pawn of the Roman Catholic Pope? [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
-Gary V. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 12:16 pm
The Grievor has been a devout Roman Catholic for approximately 17 years. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
The first major decision of the Supreme Court on this point - Central Bank of India v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am
25 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 23 from 2012: HV 8599 G8 K45 2012 This side of silence : human rights, torture, and the recognition of cruelty Tobias Kelly. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:40 pm
Vito Caruso will oversee cases outside New York City, which will be assigned to four regionally designated judges: Justice Michael Mackey, Justice Michael V. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:31 am
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Ableman v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm
Hence, as Justice O'Connor put it in her concurrence in McCreary County, Ky. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 9:00 pm
Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:41 am
Citing its previous decision in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm
Just as the Supreme Court is preparing for oral argument regarding the validity under the Equal Protection clause of same-sex marriage restrictions on the 26th (Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Grzelak v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:30 am
Marsh, Goldman v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 3:53 pm
Hund went on to argue for the same interpretation of Jones v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
Before anyone else emails the IPKat to let him know, he can tell you that he is fully aware of the two big trade mark rulings from the Court of Appeal for England and Wales last Friday in Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. v Cadbury UK Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1174 and JW Spear & Son Ltd, Mattel Inc and Mattel UK Ltd v Zynga Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 1175 and he will be providing separate Katposts on them in the fullness of time. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:49 am
Hansen In Pulido v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:09 am
The Court identified the inherent risks of arbitrary government action in secret surveillance in the present case and found again—following its stance in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
