Search for: "Ross v. State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
DYNEGY INC. v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm
Smith v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:51 pm
Midrex Div., Midland Ross Corp., 556 P.2d 1337, 1339 (Or. 1976) (en banc) (citations omitted); see also Miner v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
See a succinct summary of the majority’s reasoning in Vavilov by Rebecca Ross, a student at Osgoode Hall Law School, [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm
(Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions En banc CAFC affirms ITC decision on patent misuse in Princo v ITC (ITC 337 Update) (ITC Law Blog) (Patently-O) (IPBiz) District Court Columbia: Bilski renders claim for method of ‘computing a price to sell fixed income assets and generating a financial analysis’ invalid: Graff/Ross Holdings LLP v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
As LaCroix later explains, this consensus “held that slavery was a local matter, that the states alone could regulate it, and that therefore the U.S. government lacked authority over slavery in the states” (216). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:18 am
Copyright/Intellectual Property * Fox News Network, LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:28 am
Kische USA LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
In 1984, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called Graham v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 10:17 am
See, e.g., Board ofTrade ofCity ofChicago v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm
The “Keys Under Doormats” authors are Harold Abelson, Ross Anderson, Steven M. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
