Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 14,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2021, 4:46 pm
In Janny v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
Or is it instead permitted, despite Valentine, by analogy to the court’s 2008 decision in Munaf v. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
Northern California River Watch v, Wilcox, No. 08-15780,(August 25, 2010)(Dorothy W. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
Links to the Supreme Court’s original judgment and press summary are available here. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
" United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
[Ilya Somin] A dubious effort to use Brown v. Board of Education to attack the current Supreme Court
23 May 2014, 1:40 pm
In part because of Earl Warren’s desire to achieve unanimity, the Brown opinion does not actually overrule Plessy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v Gorman, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McDowall and Her Majesty’s Advocate v Paterson, heard 28 – 30 June 2011. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
George W. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
In a new case, known as United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 3:57 am
Sh. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Kolarik, II, and Sanders W. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:14 pm
That's the whole gist of the Court's contrast in New York v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:28 am
" Haskell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:09 pm
The Court’s 1873 decision in Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, called for a very narrow view of the Fourteenth Amendment’s applicability to state law. [read post]
