Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
” Jennifer Harris asked if it’s time for new rules regarding Chinese investment in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:20 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
“The law must make it clear to governments around the world that any illegal attack in the United States will be answered in court in the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm by Scott Bomboy
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a “constitutional actor,” even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm by Christine Corcos
First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a “constitutional actor,” even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
While not explicitly stated – because this is a work of legal history – this Article obviously has implications for modern issues surrounding marriage equality, child-custody based on interstate recognitions of status changes, the interstate recognition of gender transitions, and the legal rights of non-citizens within the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Robert E. Connolly
The individual certainly cannot travel to the United States and travel elsewhere in the world risks detention and possible extradition to the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 10:28 am by Jon Katz
Scott, 524 U.S. 357, 365 (1998) (‘In most cases, the State is willing to extend parole only because it is able to condition it upon compliance with certain requirements. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 1:39 pm by Steven Boutwell
The RMP Coalition consists of several affected industry trade groups, manufacturing groups, and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 12:17 am
State, the high court struck down an amended version of the statute, which had permitted judges to impose a death sentence if 10 or more jurors recommended death.The Florida Supreme Court also ruled that the unanimity requirement would apply to death-row prisoners whose direct appeals had been decided after the United States Supreme Court's June 2002 decision in Ring v. [read post]