Search for: "SEC v. Downe"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2008, 3:23 am
The Supreme Court keeps saying -- we mean what we say (Simmons v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:37 pm
Because under Miller v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 10:55 am
In Chong et. al. v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:27 pm
The trial court, applying the standard laid down in Gartenberg v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm
Bakke 1978 decision which struck down race exclusive quotas as violative of the U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:00 am
(See, SEC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 9:31 am
In the Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA, Sec. 47 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:09 am
The employer’s assertion that the employee’s comp time claims were not preempted by Sec. 301 failed for substantially the same reasons. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am
As Justice Kavanaugh explained in his powerful concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:06 am
For the second quarter of 2012, the new revenue estimate was $1.111 billion, down from about $1.175 billion previously. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:06 am
For the second quarter of 2012, the new revenue estimate was $1.111 billion, down from about $1.175 billion previously. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:45 am
The Supreme Court has just recently endorsed the view that the agency can change its mind in matters such as this (FCC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Penal Code, sec. 21.15). [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 4:43 pm
ESTClemson Tigers v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause, and Lagos v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
This morning’s second argument is in WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The legislation can be broken down into four broad categories: 1) substantive reforms to the laws the NSA believes allow it to conduct its surveillance programs, 2) disclosure of the FISA Court opinions that determined the programs were legal, 3) general reporting of the number and types of surveillance orders received by recipients and how many users affected, and 4) reforms to the FISA Court. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
