Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2010, 7:37 am
Sellers did state in the Coyle article that he thinks '"our clients remain resolute in their belief that statements by the secretary of Agriculture that he wants to settle [the] case are ones they can rely on. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
 It reinstated that “genericide” does not occur “until the trademark has gone so far toward becoming the exclusive descriptor of the product that sellers of competing brands cannot compete effectively without using the name” TY Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 5:40 pm
Recently, the Department of Health and Human Services filed its Answer in RxUSA Wholesale, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:35 am by Kyle Hulten
Two years after they purchased D & V, the Aspelunds filed a law suit complaining that the Olerichs had made a material omission by failing to disclose the state of these key client relationships. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:11 am by Patricia Salkin
  Discovery Builders, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2023 WL 4115074 (CA App. 6/22/2023). [read post]
Preliminary questions were referred to the CJEU for clarification as to whether and under what circumstances Amazon might be held directly liable for trade mark infringement stemming from a third-party seller’s advertisement, bearing in mind that the CJEU already answered a related question regarding Amazon’s storage services in Coty v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:57 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Here's a collection of some of the commentary about yesterday's oral arguments in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
As in the United States, pre-merger integration, coordination and/or information sharing is an important antitrust issue under Canada's Competition Act. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:03 am by jmalcolm
European Filmspeler Case In Europe, the case Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems (Filmspeler) was brought against a seller of Kodi boxes that came pre-installed with third-party plugins that were configured to access copyright-infringing streams. [read post]