Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 41,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
United States Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Record on review Review under 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1) is limited to the record that was before the state court that adjudicated the claim on the merits. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
So consider last year's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 5:47 am
The complaint (full text) in State of California v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 3:33 pm
The court reaffirmed the 2002 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Mackin v New Brunswick, which held that the state only has limited immunity. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
I suppose that the extra displacement aspect of the statute would make that statute a somewhat heavier political lift, but if the Republicans can get rid of Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 9:56 pm
Of particular note is the part of the court's opinion distinguishing Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
It’s conceivable that the Court could impose new limits on Congress’s Elections Clause powers in Arizona v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
” Reluctantly, we conclude that such relief is beyond our constitutional power. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
The court of appeals stated that the citizen suit provision would apply if IEEC had violated a term or condition of the permit, or if IEEC had sought to begin building and operating the power plant without obtaining a permit under SCAQMD’s merged Title V/construction permit system. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:43 am
Among other objections, he complains that the Court has put a "choke-hold" on the inherent political power of Iowans. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Read the Wisconsin State Journal (Riley Vetterkind) article, or the 4-3 decision in Wisconsin Legislature v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
As stated in a previous article, the only entity that intrinsically holds the power of eminent domain is the state. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:55 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
Ali United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:14 pm
As well as makes whatever supplications to higher powers that may or may not have transpired.Then, in December, one of the members of the majority, Judge Kozinski, leaves the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
