Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 7,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
Louisiana, in which the justices considered whether the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a unanimous jury applies to the states, and Rotkiske v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) where Justice Kennedy created the “significant nexus” test for determining whether streams and/or wetlands were protected under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) where Justice Kennedy created the “significant nexus” test for determining whether streams and/or wetlands were protected under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
See Democratic Party v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:00 am
The majority opinion in the case, United States Army Corps of Eng'rs v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
It would even be open to liberal red-state supreme courts to find a state constitutional right to abortion, at least pending recall or reversal by the voters.But now suppose the Supreme Court were to overrule Fisher v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
The state of California’s stay application is in Kane v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:20 am
On June 23, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
(Alden v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:11 am
The petition in Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
” Justice Kennedy’s opinions like Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:35 am
Justice Breyer announced today’s only opinion, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
In Kennedy v United Kingdom the Court held that the IPT procedure not only fulfilled all the requirements of Article 6, including equality of arms, but that it provided a sufficient remedy for individuals who suspected that they were subject to secret surveillance so that there was no breach by the UK under Article 13. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:41 am
Stanford student Jacob Heller summarizes Monday's argument in Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 1:14 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Hans v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm
Finally, the Supreme Court has not really taken a significant state sovereign immunity case since Justice O'Connor's parting gift in Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
