Search for: "STATE v. DOUGLAS"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
Second, he states that the Court’s decision in Pearson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 12:26 pm
Federal courts have a well-established burden shifting test to analyze claims of discrimination under the landmark decision McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:44 pm
Constitution--thus the state of Georgia and its respective state court in Douglas County must also comply with such laws. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:18 pm
United States, 587 U. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
" Kastigar v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 7:50 am
In Strong v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:46 am
United States may be moot, the D.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 3:29 am
” The college was recognized as one of the schools teaching and advancing eugenics in the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 10:24 am
Douglas evinced the same material-alteration understanding of the phrase “watered down” in his concurrence in the 1963 landmark case, Gideon v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:39 pm
The case is entitled Douglas v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:11 am
Robert Phillips, No. 96,754 (Sedgwick)State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
United States Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, authored the Court’s opinion in Williams v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
Ct., Douglas Cty., Oct. 14, 2008). [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:19 am
That derives from Gallagher v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:13 am
In addition, as Justice Sotomayor pointed out, Arizona – unlike at least some other states – requires ineffective assistance claims to be brought in collateral post-conviction proceedings, and so the vindication of the right to counsel for “first-tier” review that the Court recognized in Douglas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
The 1953 case in which the Supreme Court established it, United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 11:05 am
Douglas, Owen J. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:09 pm
The case is USA v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:09 pm
The case is USA v. [read post]
