Search for: "Sees v. Sees" Results 1261 - 1280 of 122,014
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 6:17 am by Ronald Mann
My guess is that future years will see young professors being awarded tenure for their critical consideration of the topic. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Above the Law
[Roll on Friday] * Biglaw sees more room to grow in Chicago. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The elements of the malpractice claim were adequately pleaded at this stage of the proceedings (see Jarmuth v Wagner, 219 AD3d 1248 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:07 pm by Adam Levitin
There will be some lingering legal questions about whether an opt-out provision binds a creditor who received solely publication notice and doesn’t receive or return a ballot, but I have trouble seeing a large number of suits materializing against the Sacklers before statutes of limitations run even if publication notice isn’t binding. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
              In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]