Search for: "Settle v. State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 15,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2008, 9:56 am
United States, No. 06-1164 (Jan. 8, 2008), the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:56 pm
The order states that because Community Financial Services Association v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 12:24 pm
Said Dispute was filed on July 28, 2014, and had requested $87,5000, but was ultimately settled for $60,000, FINRA states. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:03 am
The new cases include: Hazel Walsh v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
At [34] the CA stated the general rule in future. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm
When wage-and-hour disputes are investigated by state or federal authorities, there may be a finding of wrongdoing and the company may agree to settle the matter with the government, in an effort to avoid litigation. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of State Farm Mut. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:34 pm
FDA case, which settled in December 2015. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In its 6-3 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 9:52 pm
Williams v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am
Tsuruta v Tsuruta, 2022 WL 4299814( E.D. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
(citing Thomas v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 5:48 am
Additional Resources: Broward settles case of teen run over by bus, Jan. 24, 2017, By Brittany Wallman, Sun-Sentinel More Blog Entries: Baugh v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:30 am
County officials agreed with the move in late July, in a case Commissioner Rodney Ellis said was “as big as Brown v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:30 am
County officials agreed with the move in late July, in a case Commissioner Rodney Ellis said was “as big as Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm
See, Arizona v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 12:21 am
Lincoln Financial Securities Corp. recently settled with FINRA concerning supervisory deficiencies over a now-deceased rep (Kenneth Wayne McLeod) who purportedly ran a Ponzi scheme targeting retired government employees (Department of Enforcement v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 9:38 pm
The decision in United States v. [read post]
