Search for: "Shores v. Shores"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 1:20 pm
In the case of Ken Watts v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
Subsequently, in Doherty, the House of Lords accepted that some modification to the standard Wednesbury principles was needed in order to shore up gateway (b) (see Lord Hope at [55]). [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Before Goodridge v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
In other words, the discussion within the EIR provided the missing framework and context to shore up the mitigation requirement. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Last month the First Judicial District Court of Appeal for Illinois reached its opinion in Ballard v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 11:55 am
(See V.C. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
County of Madera and Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Plaintiffs Helen Pitts, 78, Kenneth Roman, 47, Denise Hodges, 53, and Ricki Ainey 30, filed a class-action lawsuit, asserting the state's Department of Health and Hospitals is poised to slash its long-term personal care services program to help shore up a $1.6 million budget. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: David Lammy announces research programme to explore role of IP as facilitator of innovation and economic growth (IPKat) (IPKat) (IAM) USPTO to use Indian traditional knowledge database (Managing Intellectual Property) (Spicy IP) (Securing Innovation) Global Global - General Forbidden City, global firm and thank you (IP Think… [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:28 am
The Court actually can sidestep a number of more difficult questions in patent law (about the precise meaning of the standard under Diamond v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
However, to paraphrase Justice Stephen Breyer, writing in Heffernan v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Shore v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
The case is Villanueva v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
Chandler v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Following the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU’s) decision in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Second, Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Second, Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
