Search for: "Smith v. State" Results 1261 - 1280 of 11,004
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Nonetheless, Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
  The issue was discussed at some length in another pharmacy case, Smith v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:25 am by John Day
Oct. 8, 2014), the Court of Appeals relied on the recent Tennessee Supreme Court decision of Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
 Specifically, Smith now states that, in early March of 2013, Scarbrough showed Smith the photos, which were contained in a hidden file on a computer in the Geek Squad precinct. [read post]
Lee
8 Jul 2010, 12:23 pm by Jon Sands
Smith concurred, focusing on the lack of AEDPA deference given to the state courts by the district court under AEDPA.U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:03 pm
Smith, No. 07-0758 [docket sheet]. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 2:15 pm by scanner1
THE SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Arthrex, Inc., No. 19-1434; Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:48 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
In Employment Division v Smith (the case that gave rise to the law at issue in Boerne), the Court held that Native Americans who ingested peyote sacramentally were not exempt from state drug laws (and could, therefore, be denied unemployment benefits when fired for using peyote.) [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm
 I nonetheless wanted to identify one particular paragraph that stuck out to me as much less powerful than the rest of the opinion, as well as being potentially dispositive.The question is whether Section 1447(c) requires the district court to remand a CAFA-removed case to state court, rather than dismissing it, once the plaintiff is found to lack standing. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:44 pm by Bexis
Just a quickie post about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
Morgan Smith reports in the Texas Tribune, "A specially appointed court of review vacated the State Commission on Judicial Conduct's sanction of Sharon Keller today, saying the state board acted unconstitutionally in reprimanding the presiding judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals. [read post]