Search for: "South Carolina v. United States"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2010, 10:51 am
” However I also applaud the United States Supreme Court for ultimately abolishing an intrinsic/extrinsic distinction that rewards fraud and confuses everyone. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Dodd, Victoria J.Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2010.Election LawKF4886 .K37 2010Campaign rules : a 50-state guide to campaigns and elections in America / Nina Kasniunas and Daniel M. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:25 am
I-10 continues south to Fort Stockton, San Antonio,Houston and on to Florida; I- 20 emerges to travel north through Dallas, Shreveport, and on to South Carolina, where it merges with the great I-95 northeast corridor. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:05 am
South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 324 (2006) (quoting Crane v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
Smith, which applied the United States Supreme Court decision in Troxell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Turner v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
LightAir (EPLAW) Switzerland Madonna: no mercy from the highest court (of Switzerland) (Class 46) UAE Bahrain – new Implementing Regs enter force (Class 99) United Kingdom Collecting from charity to be balanced against collecting for charity – new deal between charities and music creators (1709 Blog) The PCC Page, no.5: taking a look at the road map (PatLit) UK: Mr Ian Hargreaves to lead independent review into how IP system can better drive growth and innovation (IP:JUR) (Class… [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
The "Diocese of Virginia" thereby established was soon followed by similar autonomous branches of the Church of England in New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Maryland and Delaware. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:59 pm
Having separate patents in every country in Europe would be a lot like each State within the United States having its own patent system and needing to pursue a patent in Virginia largely separately and distinctly from pursuing a patent in Maryland, Pennsylvania, West Virginia or North Carolina. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court accepted certiorari on the South Carolina case of Price v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:33 pm
I suspect a lot of the recent interest comes from some bills introduced over the past year in Oklahoma, Arizona and South Carolina, which seek to remove, among other things, Sharia law from being "considered" by judges in state courts. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
United States (Granted )Docket: 09-11328Issue(s): Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (11th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming) In the following case, the Court granted cert. on the questions presented, and ordered the parties to brief the following additional question: “Does the Court have jurisdiction to review the decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court? [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
The case involves a South Carolina man who has been put in jail for contempt three times for failure to pay child support. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Amicus brief for the Center for Family Policy and Practice, et al.Amicus brief of the Constitution ProjectBrief of South Carolina Department of Social Services in oppositionBrief of Rebecca Price in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Archstone Multifamily Series I Trust v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:54 pm
The ex-husband was from New Jersey and the ex-wife was from South Carolina. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:42 pm
Exhibit D is described as “a heavily redacted transcript of testimony from an apparently completely public criminal proceeding in South Carolina. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
The issue on appeal is the application of the “full faith and credit” clause of the United States Constitution,[1] as interpreted by Durfee v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
South Carolina Dep't of Corr., C/A No. 4:08-2955-CMC-TER, 2008 WL 4831484, at *1 n. 1 (D.S.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:47 am
Attorney Ryan McCabe recently discussed United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
