Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 12,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 9:24 am
It should also be noted, when comparing how California treats restaurant workers compared to other states with a lower minimum wage and tip offset credits, California, and especially Los Angeles, has one of the highest costs of living in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
June 12, 1942, an Information was filed in the District Court for Northern California charging a violation of the Act of March 21, 1942, in that petitioner had knowingly remained within the area covered by Exclusion Order No. 34. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
June 12, 1942, an Information was filed in the District Court for Northern California charging a violation of the Act of March 21, 1942, in that petitioner had knowingly remained within the area covered by Exclusion Order No. 34. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
June 12, 1942, an Information was filed in the District Court for Northern California charging a violation of the Act of March 21, 1942, in that petitioner had knowingly remained within the area covered by Exclusion Order No. 34. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 4:24 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:49 am
§§ 1331, 1362 and 1367, in that plaintiffs claims arise under the laws of the United States, including federal common law, plaintiff is an American Indian tribe with a governing body duly recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as maintaining government-to-government relations with the United States and exercising jurisdiction over the federal trust lands of the Cahuilla Indian Reservation in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County,… [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am
United States, explicitly recognized the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant for access to cell site location information. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
Yesterday, Whistleblowers in United States ex. rel.Fowler v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:59 pm
United States District Court Judge Susan Illston (Northern District of California) certified a class action alleging violation of Labor Code §§ 203, 226 and 2699. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:56 pm
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, December 16 – Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review City of Boise v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:40 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am
P. 26(f) (United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah) District of Vermont Rule 26. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:29 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm
However, as we wrote back in December 2019, at the eleventh hour a federal judge in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of California granted a temporary restraining order to enjoin enforcement of AB 51. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:11 pm
By Robert Milligan and Grace Chuchla Using a forum selection clause to transfer a case out of California federal court may have become easier thanks to a recent order from Judge Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
