Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 3:54 pm
We've been busy filing an appellate brief and drafting another, so until now, haven't had the chance to post up links about Tuesday's New York Court of Appeals oral argument in Kaur v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:25 am
In Berry v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:14 am
Illinois State Court Opinions Zekman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
” Here is the Virginia AG’s statement: Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has decided not to join other states in an amicus brief on behalf of Albert Snyder in Snyder v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:11 pm
” The case cite is Rawlings Sporting Goods Co., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
In 1999, Bill Wagner became a plaintiff in Howard v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:47 pm
In a sense, there is a battle here for the moral high ground. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:00 pm
With offices throughout the Bay Area, California divorce lawyer Lorna Jaynes approaches a divorce case as a problem to be solved collaboratively, not a battle to be won. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
Proving liability in a Florida slip-and-fall case can sometimes be an uphill battle. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
In Tobaccoville USA, Inc., v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:27 am
The United States Supreme Court may soon add some clarity to this area. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
Augusto Supreme Indecision: Costco v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 10:49 am
That case, NCAA v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:32 am
Dewey Phillip Bryant of Mississippi to respond to a petition asking it to decide whether the inclusion of the Confederate Battle Flag on the state’s flag violates the equal protection clause; she notes that “the move means that at least one justice is taking a close look at the case” and suggests it may be Justice Clarence Thomas, who “has shown an interest in state displays of symbols associated with racism and slavery. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
That could, obviously, create a serious battle between states and courts but it is presumably within the authority of the court. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Bouzari v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:00 pm
United States, (Docket No. 15-1445). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:30 am
Rohn v. [read post]
