Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 19,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm
Smith (Disenrollment)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlEstate of Ducheneaux v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
So I assume that when the Bill returns to the House later this month, everyone will be in favour, no? [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:42 pm
A billing rate of $200 per hour was appropriate for the second associate. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:09 pm
However, this bill has been amended to instead deal with state employees’ allotment of time off for observance of religious holidays. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:17 am
A state’s highest court generally gets to have the last word on insurance policy interpretation. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:00 pm
College Savings Bank v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 8:34 am
In Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 10:50 am
Senate Bill 25-125 seeks to correct a potential imbalance created by the Colorado Court of Appeals in the Appleby v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
The bill was drawn by Mr. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:47 pm
Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:37 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
Forty other states plus the Multistate Tax Commission supported Supreme Court review of the Nevada v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:30 am
.: State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm
In 2019, California Assembly Bill 5, also known as AB5, expanded the landmark California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm
” 332 years later The four defendants attempted to shut down prosecutions against them by relying on Article 9 of the 1688 Bill of Rights, which states: That the Freedome of Speech and Debates or Proceedings in Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament. [read post]
