Search for: "State v. Billings"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 19,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2010, 2:41 pm
Bill Cassara and our friends at the Army Defense Appellate Division have filed a cert petition seeking review of CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:17 am
A state’s highest court generally gets to have the last word on insurance policy interpretation. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 1:51 am
In American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Louisiana v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
The bill was drawn by Mr. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
Bill Watson (Harvard Law School) has posted Did the Court in SFFA Overrule Grutter? [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:42 pm
District Court granted a motion for a preliminary injunction in Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:47 pm
Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 10:50 am
Senate Bill 25-125 seeks to correct a potential imbalance created by the Colorado Court of Appeals in the Appleby v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:22 am
Fishbaugh DA 19-0149 2021 MT 78N Criminal – Sexual Intercourse without Consent City of Billings v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:42 pm
A billing rate of $200 per hour was appropriate for the second associate. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm
” 332 years later The four defendants attempted to shut down prosecutions against them by relying on Article 9 of the 1688 Bill of Rights, which states: That the Freedome of Speech and Debates or Proceedings in Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:28 am
Interestingly, clause 5(2) is specifically stated to be without prejudice to cl. 5(1). [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:00 pm
College Savings Bank v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:09 pm
Jewell (Tribal Federal Recognition)Patchak v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 8:34 am
In Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:37 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
When the Court denied certiorari in American Axle v. [read post]
